Hurricane Ian: Should We Keep Rebuilding In Disaster Prone Areas?
Hurricane Ian has again ignited the big debate over whether disaster prone areas should be rebuilt, or not.
This has yet again been another huge tragedy. The loss of life, and livelihoods, and entire lifetimes of memories and hard work cannot be taken lightly, and should not be forgotten quickly.
Still, while fresh at hand, it is an important moment to revisit this question. So, what are the arguments and math for rebuilding or not? What should investors, homeowners, homebuyers, and even renters be thinking about?
Refusing To Be Beaten
In many scenarios in life and business, including disasters, it is noble to refuse to quit, and to be determined to rebuild.
This can certainly be true of one time events. Or even ultra rare events. In fairness, some areas impacted by Hurricane Ian have been hit the hardest they have in 100 years.
Yet, there are many parts of the country, where hurricanes, blizzards, tornadoes, wildfires, and earthquakes are a common occurrence. Even having their own season every year.
If you really love where you live and own property that much, and that is worth more to you than the money and hassle of rebuilding, then no one should hold you back. Providing you are covering the bill, and not them.
With great insurance, or plenty of other investments elsewhere, this may not be a problem. You can have a brand new property. Which may be even better than the last one.
The Futility & Economics Of Rebuilding
At the same time, it is wise to remember that these events can be very regular and predictable. You may have to deal with three storms like this in a single year.
In many areas around the country incurring major damage is not a matter of if it is going to happen, just when, how often, and how hard.
In reality insurance never seems to covers enough. Even if you do get your claim paid it may only come after a long fight that lasts years. Along with lots of legal expenses. All while paying for somewhere else to live in the meantime.
For real estate investors it can mean no income from rentals, and dealing with no utilities for a month or two. With storms like this, it seems that no matter how strong homes are built, they can be wiped out.
It can be a vicious and expensive cycle. One which many have not priced in when they are buying property.
The Options For Investors
As an investor, this is a reminder to build in risk based pricing. Do the math on long term rentals, including if you have to rebuild at least once, and go another 12-24 months without income. Consider how that may change your offers.
Investors can help those deciding not to rebuild and moving to other areas that offer more sustainable living. Either by giving them good deals on housing where they are moving to, or acquiring old homes at a fair price for the current condition and flipping them.
They can be sold to those who are still bullish and wanting to rebuild or live there. Which, again is perfectly fine, if this is extra play money you can afford to lose every few years and the return on the experience works for you. If you have $1B in the bank, and it’s worth $10M every few years to have a vacation home with your perfect view, then why not.
Rehabbing is certainly questionable. There will be a lot of remedial work and dangerous mold to get rid of. It is probably better to wholesale properties as is. Especially in a declining market, with infrastructure issues, labor shortages, and high material costs.
Summary
There are arguments for both rebuilding and quitting disaster prone areas. Have you moved away, stayed, invested elsewhere , diversified better, or started using risk based pricing to account for these cycles?